Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:53

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
GUNTHER wins the world heavyweight championship back from Jey Uso - Cageside Seats
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Microsoft’s Free New Windows Upgrade: How It Works And How To Get It - Forbes
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Log in to your Samsung account by the end of next month or forever hold your peace - Android Police
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
10 Albums Out This Week You Should Listen to Now - Pitchfork
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Scientists Uncover Giant Spiders That Once Terrorized Jurassic Earth - The Daily Galaxy
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Google, Meta and Snap think this tech is the next big thing - CNN
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Dog attacks on postal workers are the most they’ve been in 7 years - NBC News